The diagnosis and management of extrauterine and uterine ectopic pregnancy

Hum Reprod Update · 2025 · Europe

Source and licence

Authors
Jessica Farren, Bassel H Al Wattar, Davor Jurkovic
Title
The diagnosis and management of extrauterine and uterine ectopic pregnancy
Journal
Human Reproduction Update, 2025
Licence
CC BY 4.0
Changes
Verbatim excerpts; formatting adapted

Full text retrieved 2026-10-27 from Europe PMC · PMC12922837

Licence statement of the original publication

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

This page reproduces excerpts of the original publication; the original is authoritative. It has not been reviewed by a physician, does not state a recommendation of Medelix and does not replace medical advice. The guideline may have been updated since.

Open the original publication →Full text on Europe PMC

Abstract

In the last two decades, we have consolidated our knowledge of the epidemiology and risk factors for ectopic pregnancies. Minimally invasive surgical skills are now widespread, and laparoscopic surgery is recognized as the best and safest operative treatment for extrauterine ectopic pregnancies. Based on the evidence from randomized trials published a decade ago, laparoscopic salpingectomy is accepted as the optimal surgical treatment for tubal ectopic pregnancy. However, with recent advances in surgical techniques and improvement in surgical skills, the appropriateness of tubal removal versus conservation is under increasing scrutiny. Improvements in the organization and provision of care for women presenting with early pregnancy complications, in conjunction with better quality and wider use of ultrasound imaging, have resulted in an increased ability to detect small failing ectopic pregnancies, which were impossible to diagnose in the past. Many of these pregnancies are destined to resolve spontaneously without the need for any intervention. The necessity to avoid overtreatment and the potential for iatrogenic harm in such cases has facilitated the introduction of expectant management into mainstream clinical practice. This represents one of the key developments in the care for women with ectopic pregnancies. By contrast, the efficacy of medical management with methotrexate has been questioned. Another important development in recent years has been a rapid rise in the prevalence of ectopic pregnancies that are located outside the uterine cavity but within the confines of the uterus, the largest burden of which is from Caesarean scar ectopic pregnancies. This has promoted the development of new terminology and classification of ectopic pregnancies, with the aim of raising awareness of these increasingly prevalent types and minimizing the risk of misdiagnosis. In comparison to ectopic pregnancies outside the uterus, uterine ectopic pregnancies are more difficult to diagnose and manage, and are also associated with increased maternal morbidity, mortality, and adverse reproductive outcomes. Another challenge, which is peculiar to uterine ectopic pregnancies, is their potential to progress to reach foetal viability, albeit with a high risk of extreme prematurity. This requires women and clinicians to make difficult decisions about whether these pregnancies should be terminated to protect maternal health, despite some possibility of a good foetal outcome. Herein, we provide a comprehensive review of published literature to summarize new evidence and explore emerging themes with respect to ectopic pregnancy. Our aim is to provide an overview of modern classification and diagnosis, to summarize available treatment options and recommendations, and to emphasize longer-term outcomes, including the potential psychological impact of ectopic pregnancy. We examine current knowledge gaps and outline priorities for further research.

Contents of the original publication

The section headings of the original.

  • Introduction
  • Methods
  • Terminology and nomenclature
  • Prevalence and mortality
  • Risk factors, aetiology, and pathogenesis
  • Risk factors for tubal ecoptic pregnancy
  • Risk factors for other extrauterine ectopic pregnancy
  • Risk factors for uterine ectopic pregnancy
  • Assisted reproduction and risk of ectopic pregnancy
  • Aetiological mechanisms
  • Pathogenesis
  • Clinical evaluation and diagnosis
  • Clinical assessment
  • Imaging
  • Biochemical assessment
  • Surgical assessment
  • Histological assessment
  • Management
  • Management of tubal ecoptic pregnancy
  • Management of other extrauterine ectopic pregnancy
  • Management of uterine ectopic pregnancy
  • Long-term care
  • Ongoing Caesarean scar, intramural, abdominal, and rudimentary horn pregnancy
  • Residual ectopic and aberrant vascular supply
  • Caesarean scar niche management
  • Subsequent pregnancy
  • Psychological outcomes
  • Scope for future research
  • Conclusions
  • Contributor Information
  • Authors’ roles

A question about this guideline?

Medelix answers clinical questions from guidelines and studies – every statement with its source.

Are you the rights holder and object to this reproduction? Write to contact@medelix.ai and we will take the page down promptly. Imprint