Maternal Immunization Against Respiratory Syncytial Virus: An Updated WAidid Consensus Document on Evidence, Implementation, and Public Health Priorities

WAidid (World Association for Infectious Diseases and Immunological Disorders) · 2026 · international

Source and licence

Authors
Susanna Esposito, Matteo Riccò, Bahaa Abu-Raya et al.
Title
Maternal Immunization Against Respiratory Syncytial Virus: An Updated WAidid Consensus Document on Evidence, Implementation, and Public Health Priorities
Journal
Vaccines, 2026
Licence
CC BY 4.0
Changes
Verbatim excerpts; formatting adapted

Full text retrieved 2026-10-27 from Europe PMC · PMC13611319

Licence statement of the original publication

Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.

This page reproduces excerpts of the original publication; the original is authoritative. It has not been reviewed by a physician, does not state a recommendation of Medelix and does not replace medical advice. The guideline may have been updated since.

Open the original publication →Full text on Europe PMC

Recommendations

We found no explicitly labelled recommendations in this publication; its recommendations are in the running text of the original.

Abstract

Background: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a major cause of lower respiratory tract disease and hospitalization in early infancy. The availability of maternal RSVpreF vaccination and long-acting infant monoclonal antibodies has created two effective but operationally distinct pathways for passive protection. Methods: This WAidid consensus document focuses on maternal RSV immunization within an integrated early infancy prevention strategy. A multidisciplinary Consensus Development Group reviewed evidence on infant RSV burden and seasonality, maternal vaccine efficacy and effectiveness, transplacental antibody transfer, long-acting monoclonal antibodies, implementation, equity, and economic considerations. Recommendations were developed using a modified Delphi process with a prespecified consensus threshold of at least 75% agreement. Results: Maternal vaccination can provide protection from birth when administered sufficiently before delivery, whereas direct infant monoclonal antibody prophylaxis provides rapid protection independent of maternal immune response and placental transfer. The relative value of the two approaches depends on gestational age, vaccination-to-delivery interval, infant risk, birth timing, local RSV circulation, antenatal care access, product availability, and cost. Post-pandemic disruption of RSV seasonality increases the importance of flexible strategies that protect infants born outside historically defined seasonal windows. Direct head-to-head evidence remains limited; therefore, policy decisions should integrate trial efficacy, emerging real-world effectiveness, implementation feasibility, and local epidemiology rather than assume universal superiority of one strategy. Conclusions: Maternal vaccination and infant monoclonal antibodies should be positioned within a coordinated prevention pathway. Maternal vaccination may serve as the principal strategy for appropriately timed pregnancies with reliable antenatal access, while infant monoclonal antibodies are particularly important when maternal vaccination is absent, too close to delivery, or potentially ineffective, or when the infant is preterm or otherwise at increased risk. Surveillance and locally adapted implementation are essential to maintain protection as RSV epidemiology evolves.

Contents of the original publication

The section headings of the original.

  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Methods
  • 3. Epidemiology of RSV
  • 3.1. Seasonality of RSV Circulation
  • 3.2. Burden of RSV in Infants and Children
  • 4. Preventive Options
  • 4.1. Monoclonal Antibodies
  • 4.2. Vaccines
  • 5. Conclusions
  • Institutional Review Board Statement
  • Informed Consent Statement

A question about this guideline?

Medelix answers clinical questions from guidelines and studies – every statement with its source.

Are you the rights holder and object to this reproduction? Write to contact@medelix.ai and we will take the page down promptly. Imprint