Lipid-Lowering Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndrome
Journal of Clinical Medicine · 2024 · Europe
Source and licence
- Authors
- Edita Pogran, Achim Leo Burger, David Zweiker et al.
- Title
- Lipid-Lowering Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndrome
- Journal
- Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2024
- Licence
- CC BY 4.0
- Changes
- Verbatim excerpts; formatting adapted
Full text retrieved 2026-10-27 from Europe PMC · PMC11012397
Licence statement of the original publication
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
This page reproduces excerpts of the original publication; the original is authoritative. It has not been reviewed by a physician, does not state a recommendation of Medelix and does not replace medical advice. The guideline may have been updated since.
This is a review of another guideline (2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes, ESC 2023). We do not reproduce that guideline's recommendations here – they belong to the original guideline.
Open the original publication →Full text on Europe PMC
Abstract
Achieving guideline-recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets remains a significant challenge in clinical practice. This review assesses the barriers to reaching LDL-C goals and explores the potential solutions to these issues. When aiming for the recommended LDL-C goal, strategies like “lower is better” and “strike early and strong” should be used. The evidence supports the safety and efficacy of intensive lipid-lowering therapy post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS), leading to improved long-term cardiovascular health and atherosclerotic plaque stabilization. Despite the availability of effective lipid-lowering therapies, such as high-intensity statins, ezetimibe, the combination of both, bempedoic acid, and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, a substantial proportion of patients do not meet their LDL-C targets. Contributing factors include systemic healthcare barriers, healthcare provider inertia, patient non-adherence, and statin intolerance. Statin intolerance, often rather statin reluctance, is a notable obstacle due to perceived or expected side effects, which can lead to discontinuation of therapy. In conclusion, while there are obstacles to achieving optimal LDL-C levels post-ACS, these can be overcome with a combination of patient-centric approaches, clinical vigilance, and the judicious use of available therapies. The safety and necessity of reaching lower LDL-C goals to improve outcomes in patients post-ACS are well-supported by current evidence.
Contents of the original publication
The section headings of the original.
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Current Recommendations on Lipid-Lowering Therapy
- 3. Real-World Data
- 4. The Lower the Better
- No Side Effects of Very Low LDL-Cholesterol
- 5. Strike Early and Strong
- 5.1. The Future
- 5.2. The Pleiotropic Effect of Lipid-Lowering Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndrome
- 5.3. Novel Strategies for Patients with DM2
- 6. Strategies for Improvement
- 7. Conclusions
A question about this guideline?
Medelix answers clinical questions from guidelines and studies – every statement with its source.
Are you the rights holder and object to this reproduction? Write to contact@medelix.ai and we will take the page down promptly. Imprint