FIGO good practice recommendations for vaginal birth after cesarean section

FIGO · 2025 · international

Source and licence

Authors
Eytan R Barnea, Diana Ramasauskaite, Akaninyene Eseme Ubom et al.
Title
FIGO good practice recommendations for vaginal birth after cesarean section
Journal
International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2025
Licence
CC BY 4.0
Changes
Verbatim excerpts; formatting adapted

Full text retrieved 2026-10-27 from Europe PMC · PMC12447697

Licence statement of the original publication

This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

This page reproduces excerpts of the original publication; the original is authoritative. It has not been reviewed by a physician, does not state a recommendation of Medelix and does not replace medical advice. The guideline may have been updated since.

Open the original publication →Full text on Europe PMC

Recommendations

We found no explicitly labelled recommendations in this publication; its recommendations are in the running text of the original.

Abstract

The rising global rate of cesarean section (CS) has prompted renewed focus on vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) as a safe and effective alternative to repeat CS in properly selected women. The FIGO good practice recommendations provide evidence‐based recommendations to guide VBAC care. Success rates for VBAC range from 60% to 80%, with the highest likelihood in women with prior vaginal birth, non‐recurrent CS indications, interbirth intervals ≥18 months, BMI <30 kg/m2, and spontaneous labor onset. While uterine rupture is the primary concern, its risk remains low at approximately 0.3%–0.7% for women with one prior low transverse CS. Comparisons show that VBAC generally results in similar or better maternal and neonatal outcomes than planned repeat CS, including lower maternal mortality, fewer infections, and shorter hospital stays. This article emphasizes appropriate patient counseling, facility readiness for emergency CS, and continuous fetal monitoring during labor. With proper implementation, VBAC offers a valuable strategy to reduce unnecessary repeat surgeries, improve outcomes, and support informed maternal choice.

Contents of the original publication

The section headings of the original.

  • INTRODUCTION
  • RATES OF SUCCESSFUL VBAC
  • RISK OF UTERINE RUPTURE DURING VBAC
  • OUTCOMES OF VBAC COMPARED WITH PLANNED REPEAT CESAREAN SECTION
  • Maternal outcomes
  • Neonatal outcomes
  • FACTORS AFFECTING THE PROBABILITY OF SUCCESSFUL VBAC
  • Prognostic factors for VBAC success
  • Factors affecting risk of uterine rupture during VBAC
  • SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS AND SITUATIONS
  • Multiple pregnancy and VBAC
  • Breech presentation and external cephalic version during VBAC
  • Induction and augmentation of labor during VBAC
  • Assisted vaginal birth during VBAC
  • REQUIREMENTS FOR VBAC
  • Antenatal assessment and counseling
  • Required infrastructure and setting
  • Intrapartum management
  • SUMMARY OF FIGO RECOMMENDATIONS FOR VBAC
  • CONCLUSION

A question about this guideline?

Medelix answers clinical questions from guidelines and studies – every statement with its source.

Are you the rights holder and object to this reproduction? Write to contact@medelix.ai and we will take the page down promptly. Imprint