European Stroke Organisation guidelines on stroke in women: Management of menopause, pregnancy and postpartum

ESO · 2022 · Europe

Source and licence

Authors
Christine Kremer, Zuzana Gdovinova, Yannick Bejot et al.
Title
European Stroke Organisation guidelines on stroke in women: Management of menopause, pregnancy and postpartum
Journal
European Stroke Journal, 2022
Licence
CC BY 4.0
Changes
Verbatim excerpts; formatting adapted

Full text retrieved 2026-10-27 from Europe PMC · PMC9134774

Licence statement of the original publication

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

This page reproduces excerpts of the original publication; the original is authoritative. It has not been reviewed by a physician, does not state a recommendation of Medelix and does not replace medical advice. The guideline may have been updated since.

Open the original publication →Full text on Europe PMC

Recommendations

We found no explicitly labelled recommendations in this publication; its recommendations are in the running text of the original.

Abstract

Pregnancy, postpartum and menopause are regarded as periods women are more vulnerable to ischaemic events. There are conflicting results regarding stroke risk and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) during menopause. Stroke in pregnancy is generally increasing with serious consequences for mother and child; therefore, recommendations for acute treatment with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and/or mechanical thrombectomy (MT) are needed. The aim of this guideline is to support and guide clinicians in treatment decisions in stroke in women. Following the “Grading of Recommendations and Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE)” approach, the guidelines were developed according to the European Stroke Organisation (ESO) Standard Operating Procedure. Systematic reviews and metanalyses were performed. Based on available evidence, recommendations were provided. Where there was a lack of evidence, an expert consensus statement was given. Low quality of evidence was found to suggest against the use of HRT to reduce the risk of stroke (ischaemic and haemorrhagic) in postmenopausal women. No data was available on the outcome of women with stroke when treated with HRT. No sufficient evidence was found to provide recommendations for treatment with IVT or MT during pregnancy, postpartum and menstruation. The majority of members suggested that pregnant women can be treated with IVT after assessing the benefit/risk profile on an individual basis, all members suggested treatment with IVT during postpartum and menstruation. All members suggested treatment with MT during pregnancy. The guidelines highlight the need to identify evidence for stroke prevention and acute treatment in women in more vulnerable periods of their lifetime to generate reliable data for future guidelines.

Contents of the original publication

The section headings of the original.

  • Introduction
  • Methods
  • PART 1: Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and stroke risk
  • PICO 1.1: In postmenopausal women, does HRT compared to non-prior HRT reduce the risk of ischaemic stroke in primary prevention?
  • PICO 1.2: In postmenopausal women, does HRT compared to non-prior HRT reduce the risk of haemorrhagic stroke in primary prevention?
  • PICO 1.3. In postmenopausal women with acute ischaemic stroke, does prior HRT compared with non-prior HRT impact functional outcome and mortality?
  • And
  • PICO 1.4. In postmenopausal women with acute haemorrhagic stroke, does prior HRT compared with non-prior HRT impact functional outcome and mortality?
  • PART 2. Treatment of acute ischaemic stroke in pre-menopausal women (pregnancy, postpartum, and menstruation)
  • PICO 2.1. In pregnant women with acute ischaemic stroke, does intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) improve outcome as compared to no IVT?
  • PICO 2.2. In women with acute ischaemic stroke during pregnancy, does mechanical thrombectomy (MT) or intraarterial thrombolysis (IAT) improve outcome compared to MT and/or IVT or IAT?
  • PICO 2.3. In women with acute ischaemic stroke during the postpartum period, does IVT improve outcome compared to no IVT?
  • PICO 2.4. In women with acute ischaemic stroke during the postpartum period, does MT or IAT improve outcome compared to no MT and/or IVT or IAT?
  • PICO 2.5. In women with acute ischaemic stroke during menstruation, does IVT improve outcome as compared to no IVT?
  • Discussion
  • Plain language summary
  • Supplemental Material
  • ORCID iDs

A question about this guideline?

Medelix answers clinical questions from guidelines and studies – every statement with its source.

Are you the rights holder and object to this reproduction? Write to contact@medelix.ai and we will take the page down promptly. Imprint