European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) steatotic liver disease special interest group position paper on screening, diagnosis and investigation of paediatric metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease
ESPGHAN · 2026 · Europe
Source and licence
- Authors
- Jake P Mann, Sander Lefere, Maarten Buytaert et al.
- Title
- European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) steatotic liver disease special interest group position paper on screening, diagnosis and investigation of paediatric metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease
- Journal
- Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, 2026
- Licence
- CC BY 4.0
- Changes
- Verbatim excerpts; formatting adapted
Full text retrieved 2026-10-27 from Europe PMC · PMC13539658
Licence statement of the original publication
This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This page reproduces excerpts of the original publication; the original is authoritative. It has not been reviewed by a physician, does not state a recommendation of Medelix and does not replace medical advice. The guideline may have been updated since.
Open the original publication →Full text on Europe PMC
Recommendations
Verbatim, with grade of recommendation or strength of consensus where given.
Recommendations
- In scientific research and clinical practice, MASLD and MASH are to be used as terminology for NAFLD and non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis, respectivelyLoE 3; 100%; strong consensus
- MASLD screening should start at age 10 in children with obesity (BMI z‐score ≥+2), or earlier in children with evidence of insulin resistance, dyslipidaemia, severe obesity (BMI z‐score ≥ +3), positive family history for MASLD with advanced fibrosis, or hypopituitarism.LoE 4; 96%; strong consensus
How to screen?
- We recommend a higher cut‐off of 80 IU/L to instigate mandatory immediate further investigation, as this may be a sign of liver disease of alternative aetiology needing treatment. 57 , 71 , 72 When ALT is between 30 and 80 IU/L on initial testing, and there is no concern for acute liver disease, 58 we recommend repeating testing in 2–6 months (depending on the clinical situation) to avoid over‐investigation, for example, those who have a transient rise in transaminases following a viral illness. A persistently raised ALT ≥ 30 IU/L should be investigated (Figure 1).
Recommendations
- In children eligible for screening (see recommendation 2), screening for MASLD should be performed using ALT ≥ 30 IU/L.LoE 4; 100%; strong consensus
- Diagnosis of MASLD requires demonstration of steatosis on imaging or histology (in an appropriate clinical context).LoE 3; 97%; strong consensus
- All children with suspected MASLD should have, as a minimum, first‐line investigations performed (Table 2).LoE 3; 100%; strong consensus
- Further diagnostic investigations should be performed in patients who have any red flags (Table 3).LoE 4; 100%; strong consensus
- Diagnosis of MASLD in non‐overweight (BMI z‐score <+1) children should be established by a specialist in the presence of both steatosis and metabolic dysfunction following thorough investigation.LoE 3; 100%; strong consensus
- Paediatricians should assess for associated comorbidities (e.g., insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, dyslipidaemia, arterial hypertension, kidney disease, sleep apnoea, polycystic ovary syndrome, depression and anxiety) in children with MASLD, at initial diagnosis and during the follow‐up.LoE 3; 100%; strong consensus
- Refer patients with red flags (Figure 2 and Table 3) to a specialist.LoE 3; 100%; strong consensus
- In the absence of red flags, refer children with MASLD at increased risk of advanced liver disease (ALT ≥ 80 IU/L, persistently abnormal ALT despite weight loss, pre‐diabetes or type 2 diabetes, first‐degree relative with advanced liver fibrosis) to a specialist.LoE 3; 100%; strong consensus
- ALT and GGT are suitable tools for identification and monitoring of progression/regression of MASLD in children.LoE 3; 91%; consensus
- US B‐mode of at least moderate severity (score ≥2 out of 3) can be used to diagnose hepatic steatosis in children.LoE 3; 97%; strong consensus
- US is not a suitable method to assess steatohepatitis or the degree of fibrosis in children.LoE 3; 100%; strong consensus
- In patients with a diagnosis of MASLD, CAP may be a suitable adjunct for the quantification of steatosis.LoE 4; 100%; strong consensus
- CAP > 280 dB/m is strongly associated with hepatic steatosis, but further evidence is needed to identify optimal cut‐off values for diagnosis and grading of steatosis.LoE 4; 97%; strong consensus
- Transient elastography may be useful to exclude significant liver fibrosis (<5.5 kPa) or suggest advanced chronic liver disease (>10 kPa) in children with MASLD.LoE 3; 94%; strong consensus
- In children with MASLD, there is insufficient evidence to accurately stage fibrosis with transient elastography liver stiffness measurements between 5.5 and 10 kPa.LoE 3; 100%; strong consensus
- Currently, there is insufficient evidence to recommend shear‐wave elastography for use in children with MASLD.LoE 4; 97%; strong consensus
- MRI‐PDFF has a high diagnostic accuracy for the quantification of hepatic lipid content in paediatric patients with MASLD and can serve as a non‐invasive reference standard for the assessment and monitoring of steatosis, although it is typically not available in routine clinical practice.LoE 2; 100%; strong consensus
- MRE may be useful for identification of advanced fibrosis in paediatric MASLD, although validation of optimal cut‐offs is needed, and it is typically not available in routine clinical practice.LoE 3; 100%; strong consensus
- FIB‐4, PNFI, PNFS and APRI are not recommended for diagnosis or stratification in children with MASLD.LoE 2; 100%; strong consensus
- There is insufficient evidence to recommend the use of ELF (or its components) in paediatric MASLD.LoE 3; 100%; strong consensus
- Children under 5 years old with hepatic steatosis should be investigated for genetic diseases.LoE 2; 100%; strong consensus
- Genetic testing (targeted panels or whole‐exome) may play a role in investigating alternative causes of steatotic liver disease, particularly in lean individuals.LoE 4; 100%; strong consensus
- Testing for p.Ile148Met in PNPLA3 and other common variants is currently not recommended in clinical practice.LoE 3; 91%; strong consensus
- Histopathologic evaluation of MASLD in children should include a comprehensive assessment of the biopsy to discriminate between simple steatosis or steatohepatitis, including the assessment of portal inflammation and portal‐based fibrosis, as well as a description of the zonal distribution of steatosis.LoE 4; 100%; strong consensus
- Where an experienced histopathologist has identified significant portal inflammation and/or fibrosis, the term ‘zone 1 steatohepatitis’ should be used (and not ‘borderline steatohepatitis’).LoE 4; 97%; strong consensus
Recommendation
- When biopsy is performed in children with MASLD, US‐guided technique should be used where possible.LoE 4; 100%; strong consensus
Recommendations
- Liver biopsy is an accurate tool for diagnosis and follow‐up/monitoring of paediatric MASLDLoE 2; 90%; consensus
- Liver biopsy (including repeat biopsy) should be performed in cases of diagnostic uncertainty and/or findings of more advanced liver disease (based on clinical, biochemical, imaging, or transient elastography investigations).LoE 4; 94%; consensus
- Liver biopsy may be used for risk stratification in high‐risk individuals to identify adolescents with fibrosing steatohepatitis to: (i) facilitate accurate follow‐up under adult services, (ii) initiation of drug treatment, or (iii) for clinical trials.LoE 4; 100%; strong consensus
- Each child or adolescent with MASLD needs holistic care within a multidisciplinary team for the management of metabolic dysfunctionLoE 3; 100%; strong consensus
Abstract
Metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is the most common reason for elevated liver enzymes in children in Europe, affecting more than 5% of all children. Since the last iteration of this position paper, there have been substantial advances in our understanding of the disease. After a detailed literature review and thorough discussion, we established consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and assessment of MASLD in children. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≥ 30 IU/L is a suitable screening test for MASLD in children over 10 years of age with obesity (body mass index z‐score ≥+2), or in children of any age with additional risk factors. All patients with suspected MASLD should be assessed for alternative or concomitant diagnoses, as well as comorbidities. Patients who are not overweight, under 8 years old, or have any other red flags should be promptly referred for specialist assessment. Liver biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosis and staging of MASLD, but should be reserved for diagnostic uncertainty, to guide treatment decisions, and risk stratification (e.g., prior to transition to adult care). While there is emerging data for non‐invasive tests (e.g., transient elastography), it is unclear how to routinely implement these investigations in clinical practice. Combined changes of ≥20% in both ALT and gamma‐glutamyl transferase may represent a useful non‐invasive tool for monitoring disease severity over time. Most patients are appropriately investigated and managed by non‐specialists where the focus is on holistic management of obesity and its complications. Future research should focus on how to use non‐invasive tests to risk‐stratify children, in particular, how to identify those with advanced fibrosis.
Contents of the original publication
The section headings of the original.
- INTRODUCTION
- METHODS
- Scope
- Search strategy and formulation of recommendations
- Grading of evidence
- Consensus
- Definitions
- SCREENING FOR PAEDIATRIC MASLD
- Should we screen?
- Who to screen?
- How to screen?
- DIAGNOSIS AND ASSESSMENT OF MASLD
- Diagnosis of MASLD
- Assessment of comorbidities
- When to refer to a liver specialist?
- NON‐INVASIVE INVESTIGATIONS
- Liver enzymes for identification of MASLD
- Liver enzymes for staging of MASLD
- Liver enzymes for monitoring of MASLD
- US
- Conventional B‐mode for identification and grading of steatosis
- US quantification techniques for identification and grading of steatosis
- Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP™)
- LIVER STIFFNESS MEASUREMENT (LSM)
- Transient elastography
- Shear‐wave elastography (SWE)
- MRI‐PDFF
- MRE
- Composite non‐invasive scores and serological biomarkers
- Prediction of fibrosis stage
- Enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) test
- Other biomarkers
- Genetic testing
- LIVER BIOPSY
- Histological definitions of paediatric MASLD
- Reliability and reproducibility
- Risks of liver biopsy in patients with MASLD
- Role of biopsy in assessing treatment response
- Indications for liver biopsy
- Follow‐up
- CONCLUSION
- Supporting information
- Contributor Information
A question about this guideline?
Medelix answers clinical questions from guidelines and studies – every statement with its source.
Are you the rights holder and object to this reproduction? Write to contact@medelix.ai and we will take the page down promptly. Imprint