Best Practice Recommendations for the Assessment, Prevention and Treatment of Vitamin D Deficiency in Türkiye: A 2026 Update in a Setting with Limited Mandatory Food Fortification

Turkish expert group (Nutrients, MDPI) · 2026 · Türkiye

Source and licence

Authors
Dilek Gogas Yavuz, Ömercan Topaloğlu, Mutlu Güneş et al.
Title
Best Practice Recommendations for the Assessment, Prevention and Treatment of Vitamin D Deficiency in Türkiye: A 2026 Update in a Setting with Limited Mandatory Food Fortification
Journal
Nutrients, 2026
Licence
CC BY 4.0
Changes
Verbatim excerpts; formatting adapted

Full text retrieved 2026-10-27 from Europe PMC · PMC13257591

Licence statement of the original publication

Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.

This page reproduces excerpts of the original publication; the original is authoritative. It has not been reviewed by a physician, does not state a recommendation of Medelix and does not replace medical advice. The guideline may have been updated since.

Open the original publication →Full text on Europe PMC

Recommendations

Verbatim, with grade of recommendation or strength of consensus where given.

Consensus Statements on the Treatment, Rapid Correction, Administration, and Monitoring of Vitamin D Deficiency in Adults.

  • A serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentration <20 ng/mL should be considered an indication for treatment.Cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) is recommended for supplementation and treatment.For adults, a typical daily requirement is 800–2000 IU/day.When rapid correction (loading) is not required, a maintenance-oriented regimen of 800–2000 IU/day may be used.If underlying causes of vitamin D deficiency cannot be corrected, long-term maintenance supplementation may be required.In obesity, in patients receiving medications that accelerate vitamin D metabolism (e.g., systemic glucocorticoids and antiepileptic drugs), and in malabsorption syndromes, higher maintenance doses (approximately 3000–6000 IU/day) may be required.In persistent malabsorption, substantially higher doses (e.g., 10,000–50,000 IU/day) may be required; if response remains inadequate, hydroxylated forms of vitamin D may be considered.The tolerable upper intake level for routine daily supplementation in adults is 4000 IU/day.The treatment target is to maintain serum 25(OH)D between 20 and 50 ng/mL.
  • A loading regimen is not routinely recommended but may be considered when rapid clinical correction is needed.Loading may be considered in adults with 25(OH)D <20 ng/mL and evidence suggestive of secondary hyperparathyroidism.Situations where rapid correction may be considered include very low 25(OH)D (<12 ng/mL), very high fracture risk in osteoporosis, secondary hyperparathyroidism, and hypocalcemia.Example regimen: 50,000 IU/week for 6–8 consecutive weeks, followed by 800–2000 IU/day maintenance.Alternative regimen: 6000–10,000 IU/day orally for 4 weeks, followed by 800–2000 IU/day maintenance.In obesity or malabsorption, a higher loading regimen (e.g., 100,000 IU/week for 8 weeks) may be considered, followed by maintenance (e.g., 4000–6000 IU/day) based on response.
  • Daily and intermittent cumulative regimens (weekly, every two weeks, or monthly) have comparable efficacy and safety when equivalent cumulative doses are used.Capsule, drop, and tablet formulations demonstrate similar efficacy when used at equivalent doses.Parenteral vitamin D should be reserved for selected patients (e.g., severe malabsorption, inability to take oral therapy, or critically ill patients when clinically indicated).A patient-centered regimen incorporating dosing preferences (daily/weekly/monthly) may improve adherence.
  • Serum 25(OH)D should be re-measured 8–12 weeks after initiation of treatment.Based on follow-up 25(OH)D concentrations, the regimen should be continued, adjusted, or transitioned to maintenance dosing.If 25(OH)D is within the target range (20–50 ng/mL), the same dose may be continued as maintenance therapy.If serum 25(OH)D is 50–60 ng/mL, concentrations are generally safe but exceed recommended targets; the dose and other sources of vitamin D should be reviewed.If serum 25(OH)D is 60–99 ng/mL (gray zone), the risk of complications may increase with higher concentrations; the regimen should be reviewed. Vitamin D can be stopped for 2–3 months; reconsider after measurement of 25(OH)D concentrations.If serum 25(OH)D is ≥100 ng/mL, it is defined as hypervitaminosis D; vitamin D intake should be stopped for at least 3 months, and clinical and biochemical evaluation should be undertaken.If serum 25(OH)D is ≥150 ng/mL, vitamin D intoxication (toxicity) should be considered. Vitamin D should be stopped for at least 3 months. Serum calcium levels should be measured and closely followed up.

Abstract

Background: Vitamin D deficiency is a common global health problem and remains highly prevalent in Türkiye, where limited food fortification and heterogeneous clinical practices contribute to variability in testing and supplementation strategies. Aims: To provide Türkiye-specific best practice recommendations for defining clinically relevant serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] thresholds, identifying adult risk groups for targeted testing, and recommending evidence-based prevention, treatment, and monitoring approaches while minimizing under-treatment and inappropriate high-dose use. Methods: This national expert consensus document was developed by endocrinologists from across Türkiye using a structured, modified Delphi methodology. Draft statements informed by systematic literature reviews were rated via online surveys using a 9-point Likert scale, followed by two Delphi rounds and a face-to-face consensus meeting in İstanbul in October 2025. Results: Recommendations addressed sun exposure, laboratory assessment, screening, supplementation, treatment, and follow-up. Serum 25(OH)D <20 ng/mL was defined as deficiency and <12 ng/mL as severe deficiency, with a target range of 20–50 ng/mL. Routine population-wide screening was not recommended; instead, targeted testing in high-risk adults and symptom-driven biochemical evaluation were endorsed. Empiric supplementation was recommended for selected high-risk groups, with cholecalciferol as the preferred agent. Higher individualized doses were suggested in obesity or malabsorption, while loading regimens were reserved for specific clinical indications, such as severe deficiency or certain medical conditions that impair vitamin D metabolism. Reassessment of 25(OH)D at 8–12 weeks was recommended. Conclusion: These consensus-based recommendations provide a practical, context-specific framework for assessing, preventing, treating, and monitoring vitamin D deficiency in adults in Türkiye.

Contents of the original publication

The section headings of the original.

  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Materials and Methods
  • 2.1. Expert Panel Composition
  • 2.2. Delphi Methodology
  • 3. Results and Discussion
  • 3.1. Sun Exposure and Cutaneous Vitamin D Synthesis in Türkiye
  • 3.2. Evaluation and Interpretation of Serum 25(OH)D Concentrations
  • 3.3. Screening Strategy and Targeted Biochemical Evaluation for Vitamin D Deficiency in Adults in Türkiye
  • 3.4. Empirical Vitamin D Supplementation in High-Risk Adult Groups
  • 3.5. Treatment of Vitamin D Deficiency
  • 3.6. Monitoring and Follow-Up
  • 4. Strengths and Limitations
  • 5. Conclusions

A question about this guideline?

Medelix answers clinical questions from guidelines and studies – every statement with its source.

Are you the rights holder and object to this reproduction? Write to contact@medelix.ai and we will take the page down promptly. Imprint