A Review of Pharmacologic and Non-Pharmacologic Therapies in the Management of Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Current Recommendations and Evidence
Journal of Clinical Medicine · 2024 · Europe
Source and licence
- Authors
- Anthony J Papale, Robert Flattau, Nandan Vithlani et al.
- Title
- A Review of Pharmacologic and Non-Pharmacologic Therapies in the Management of Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Current Recommendations and Evidence
- Journal
- Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2024
- Licence
- CC BY 4.0
- Changes
- Verbatim excerpts; formatting adapted
Full text retrieved 2026-10-27 from Europe PMC · PMC11594791
Licence statement of the original publication
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
This page reproduces excerpts of the original publication; the original is authoritative. It has not been reviewed by a physician, does not state a recommendation of Medelix and does not replace medical advice. The guideline may have been updated since.
This is a review of another guideline (IBS guidelines (UEG/ESNM 2022 et al.), UEG/ESNM; ACG 2022). We do not reproduce that guideline's recommendations here – they belong to the original guideline.
Open the original publication →Full text on Europe PMC
Abstract
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a highly prevalent and debilitating disorder of gut–brain interaction (DGBI) affecting millions globally. It imposes a significant burden on healthcare systems and is a leading cause of workplace absenteeism. IBS is classified into several subtypes based on predominant presenting symptoms, including IBS with constipation (IBS-C) and IBS with diarrhea (IBS-D), with each requiring targeted approaches to treatment. Some treatments, such as psychotherapy, dietary intervention, and medications like tricyclic antidepressants, are nonspecific and recommended for managing IBS symptoms across all subtypes. In contrast, therapies like secretagogues for IBS-C and eluxadoline or rifaximin for IBS-D are subtype-specific. However, many IBS treatments carry conditional recommendations and are based on low-certainty evidence, emphasizing the need for further research to expand the available treatment options. This review compares the latest IBS management guidelines from the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA), American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG), and European Society for Neurogastroenterology and Motility (ESNM). Pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic therapies, including established and emerging interventions, will be explored to provide a comprehensive guide to management.
Contents of the original publication
The section headings of the original.
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Methods
- 3. General IBS Treatment Recommendations
- 3.1. Non-Pharmacologic Treatments for All IBS Subtypes
- 3.2. Pharmacologic Treatments for All IBS Subtypes
- 4. Pharmacologic Treatments for IBS-C
- 4.1. Osmotic Laxatives
- 4.2. Chloride Channel Activators
- 4.3. Guanylate Cyclase-C Agonists
- 4.4. Serotonin 5-HT4 Receptor Agonists
- 4.5. Sodium Hydrogen Exchanger 3 Inhibitors
- 5. Pharmacologic Treatments for IBS-D
- 5.1. Opioid Receptor Agonists
- 5.2. Mixed Opioid Receptor Agonists/Antagonists
- 5.3. Non-Absorbed Antibiotics
- 5.4. Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists
- 5.5. Bile Acid Sequestrants
- 6. Non-Pharmacologic Treatments with Equivocal Evidence
- 6.1. Biotics
- 6.2. Low-Gluten Diet
- 7. Conclusions
- Institutional Review Board Statement
- Informed Consent Statement
A question about this guideline?
Medelix answers clinical questions from guidelines and studies – every statement with its source.
Are you the rights holder and object to this reproduction? Write to contact@medelix.ai and we will take the page down promptly. Imprint