Wells score (deep vein thrombosis)

Pre-test probability of leg DVT (two-level: likely / unlikely)

Sources last checked: 2026-10-13

Wells score (deep vein thrombosis)

Pre-test probability of leg DVT (two-level: likely / unlikely)

0
≤ 1 — DVT unlikely

In the Wells 2003 strategy and AWMF 2023, D-dimer is the next step: a negative result excludes DVT without ultrasound; a positive D-dimer leads to compression ultrasound.

Validated in outpatients with suspected first lower-limb DVT. It performs less well in inpatients, in suspected recurrence and in pregnancy. A three-level version (≤ 0 low, 1–2 moderate, ≥ 3 high) also exists — do not mix the two.

Source: Wells PS et al. Evaluation of D-dimer in the diagnosis of suspected deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med 2003;349(13):1227-1235.Open

Interpretation

≤ 1 — DVT unlikelyIn the Wells 2003 strategy and AWMF 2023, D-dimer is the next step: a negative result excludes DVT without ultrasound; a positive D-dimer leads to compression ultrasound.
≥ 2 — DVT likelyIn the Wells 2003 strategy and AWMF 2023, compression ultrasound is the next step; if negative, a negative D-dimer or repeat ultrasound after about a week completes the work-up.

What is the Wells score (deep vein thrombosis)?

The Wells DVT score estimates the probability of lower-limb deep vein thrombosis from nine clinical findings and one subtractive item. In the two-level form used by Wells and colleagues in a randomised management study (NEJM 2003), patients with ≤ 1 point (DVT unlikely) and a negative D-dimer could safely forgo ultrasound. It is the score used in the German AWMF S2k guideline.

When to use it

  • Outpatients or emergency patients with suspected first DVT of the leg.
  • Before ordering D-dimer, to decide whether a negative result can exclude DVT.
  • To prioritise compression ultrasound when access is limited.

When not to use it

  • Suspected upper-limb DVT.
  • Pregnancy and hospitalised patients, where performance is weaker.
  • Suspected recurrent DVT in the same leg without considering prior imaging.

How it is calculated

CriterionPoints
Active cancer (treatment ongoing, within 6 months, or palliative)+1
Paralysis, paresis or recent plaster immobilisation of the leg+1
Bedridden ≥ 3 days, or major surgery within 12 weeks (general or regional anaesthesia)+1
Localised tenderness along the deep venous system+1
Entire leg swollen+1
Calf swelling ≥ 3 cm compared with the asymptomatic side+1
Pitting oedema confined to the symptomatic leg+1
Collateral superficial veins (non-varicose)+1
Previously documented DVT+1
Alternative diagnosis at least as likely as DVT-2

Clinical pearls and limitations

  • Validated in outpatients with suspected first lower-limb DVT. It performs less well in inpatients, in suspected recurrence and in pregnancy. A three-level version (≤ 0 low, 1–2 moderate, ≥ 3 high) also exists — do not mix the two.
  • 'Alternative diagnosis at least as likely' subtracts 2 points — the score can be negative.
  • Calf circumference is measured 10 cm below the tibial tuberosity and compared with the other leg.
  • Active cancer means treatment within 6 months, ongoing treatment, or palliative care.
  • In AWMF 2023, the two-level score: ≥ 2 high probability (DVT in about 28 %), ≤ 1 low (about 6 %).

Frequently asked questions

What Wells score means DVT is likely?

In the two-level version, 2 points or more = DVT likely; 1 point or less = DVT unlikely.

Can a low Wells score exclude DVT without ultrasound?

Only together with a negative D-dimer. In Wells 2003, the D-dimer strategy had a 3-month VTE rate of 0.4 % among patients in whom DVT had been ruled out.

What is the difference between Wells DVT and Wells PE?

They are separate scores with different items and cut-offs. Wells PE uses 1–3-point items and a cut-off of > 4; Wells DVT uses 1-point items and a cut-off of ≥ 2.

Evidence and guidelines

  1. Primary source: Wells PS et al. Evaluation of D-dimer in the diagnosis of suspected deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med 2003;349(13):1227-1235.
  2. AWMF S2k 065-002 (2023), Tab. 2.1 and Empfehlung 2.2 (Wells-Score, 2-stufige Bewertung).
  3. Wells PS et al. Does this patient have deep vein thrombosis? JAMA 2006;295(2):199-207.

Have a follow-up question?

Medelix answers clinical questions from current guidelines and studies — every statement with its source.

Ask Medelix about the Wells score (deep vein thrombosis)

Related calculators

Embed this calculatorFree to use on your website, intranet or teaching page. Copy the code below.
<iframe src="https://medelix.ai/en/embed/wells-dvt" title="Wells score (deep vein thrombosis) – Medelix" width="100%" height="620" style="border:0;max-width:720px" loading="lazy"></iframe> <p><a href="https://medelix.ai/en/calculators/wells-score-dvt">Wells score (deep vein thrombosis) calculator by Medelix</a></p>

For healthcare professionals and medical students. These tools support, and do not replace, clinical judgement. Always check results against the original source and your local protocols.